![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Developtments in Macedonia |
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | ||||||
macedonia ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 01-Feb-2008 Location: Lerinsko Online Status: Offline Posts: 754 |
![]() ![]() Posted: 24-Mar-2009 at 00:22 |
|||||
Hello everyone, I have been watching the projects on this website for a long time, and just want to say I am impressed with what I see. Having said that, I also have to ask, is the Macedonian government pouring all their money in Skopje only? What happened to all the other cities in Macedonia? Aren't there any new apartments or office buildings being built in Bitola? Strumica? Kumanovo? Gevgelija? Tetovo? I would really like to hear some of your opinions this issue. Thanks.
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
lslcrew ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 14-Jan-2008 Location: Skopje Online Status: Offline Posts: 10988 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
Macedonia we have recenty discussed on thhis question, some days before. Frst of all, as in the previous discussion I want to mention that skopje creates 70% of the Macedonian GDP. According to that it is normal that the biggest part of state budget should be invested in Skopje and it's surrounding. I don't want to be understanded that Skopje should get 70 percent of the state money, but I think, since now the amount of money that is invested in Skopje is fair for Skopje and also fair for the other cities and parts of the country.
I agree with the fact that richest regions should help the poorest regions so they become more attractive, but nobody can take such a big amount of skopje's money, I'll be the first who won't let this happen. ![]() For the end, I don't want some of the media, or somebody who has never seen the numbers, to create an atmosphere that Skopje development is "sponsored" by some small cities. The situations is the opposite one, which now is in normal margins of country-internal inter-city cooperation. I don't now the exact name. ![]() |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
beTon ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 25-Jun-2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3893 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
its Law of regional development, but for now is just arrested development, cause there are too many priorities standing on the way, like unfinished process of decentralisation or ironing of the campaign for investing opportunities in Macedonia, which we hope that will bring interest for our natural wealth, which for now is on sell-out...
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
macedonia ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 01-Feb-2008 Location: Lerinsko Online Status: Offline Posts: 754 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
skopje creates 70% of the Macedonian GDP
Wow! The government needs to make that number lower for skopje and higher for other cities. I brought up this issue because I visited the city of Bitola 2 years ago, and i'm sorry to say I didn't see any new construction, all the buildings were old, and the newest buildings were at least 20 years old. And Bitola is a big city so I didn't know why there were no investments. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Cloverstack ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 01-Sep-2007 Location: Скопје Online Status: Offline Posts: 12453 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
![]() The government doesn't and shouldn't control the amount of GDP created in different cities. Also the government job is not to build buildings except in speciffic cases. Those are things determined by the open market itself. The government job is to stimulate development everywhere by different and mostly subtle methods. From the methods that are most visible, there is ofcourse the infrastructure strenghthening which is at a very low level across the country and nothing is different in Skopje's case. What country are you from? It would be interesting to tell us how that country is managing this and then we can compare it to Macedonia. As a person born and living in Skopje I can tell you thet I'm not happy at all how the government is controling the money that should be controlled by the city of Skopje and is investing it in all the wrong places while the crucial projects stay forgotten. The current style of investment in Skopje by the government is a catastrophy on so many levels. I don't see a reason to be envious of Skopje atm, feeling sorry for Skopje is a more appropriate emotion. ![]() Edited by Cloverstack - 24-Mar-2009 at 12:14 |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
гитардемон ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 19-Feb-2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5424 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
Well, as a citizen of the Republic of Macedonia, I can say that I feel like living in North Korea. The government controls all my money, tells me things that no sane person would ever believe, and tries to make me think that the rest of the world is evil and Macedonia is the place to be. But that's another thing, so let's keep it out of this discussion. As far as the investments go, I think that the general public agrees that Skopje gets all the money (just ask the Greeks which call us Republic of Skopje... why? because they think it's a banana republic consisting of one city and two villages, not that far from the truth really), but only people that come from Skopje disagree. IMHO even if Skopje would contribute 95% of the country's GDP, that's no excuse as to why all the money should be invested there. Being equal (equality) does not mean Skopje is better than you just because Skopje gives us a shitload of money and you don't. The new bill (or it already passed as a law?) that provided a monthly fee to every family which lives in a low-birthrate municipality and has 3+/4+ children, was deemed unconstitutional and even !discriminatory! because it only benefits certain parts of the country, leaving out other parts of Macedonia. OK, it was the constitutional court's verdict, they should know better than me... But how does that case differ? It's the same thing! It's unconstitutional for someone to build buildings in one part of the country, leaving out other parts! Even though this post might seem too political, the truth is... that it is!
![]() Edited by гитардемон - 24-Mar-2009 at 13:07 |
||||||
Arguing on the internet is like running at the special olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded.
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
lslcrew ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 14-Jan-2008 Location: Skopje Online Status: Offline Posts: 10988 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
Gitar, you should not take as relevant what do the people in greece mean about our country and it's geography. At least take another country becous of the well known problem.
I cannot agree with your opinion. Nobody can judge Skopje because it has developed more than other 30+ cities. Let's take Gevgelija as a example of fast development. Gevgelija is existing under the same laws and regulation as Skopje, as Bitola, as Ohrid, as Strumica etc. But Gevgelija is different thaty the other because they found a new way to make profit, the greek citizens come to Gevgelija to gamle, to wash their cars, to go to dentist, to go shopping. Why Bitola can't do that?! Thei ar the same distance from the border, they have E-corridor through their city?! Skopje cannot be the fault always about the other cities low grade of development. As I told before, NOBODY can judge Skopje because of the amount of money that Skopje "gives" for the other cities. I don't want to sound like I'am local Skopje patriot but this the sad truth about macedonian development. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
pbanks ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 01-Sep-2007 Location: Skopje Online Status: Offline Posts: 9141 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
@gitar
I agree with you but I fail to see how this is Skopje's fault? I didn't see any argumentation about this in the very same discussion in Macedonian language. The truth is that the government does control the money while all the municipalities, and especially Skopje are undermined and discriminated. Statues might cost but in essence they are a pure waste of money. Skopje won't benefit from them (probably the contrary), they won't increase the quality of life. So in simple words we are talking about a waste of money on state level, and Skopje is the victim like all the others. I'm all for equal regional development, but let's be fair in the discussion. Edited by pbanks - 24-Mar-2009 at 13:29 |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
macedonia ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 01-Feb-2008 Location: Lerinsko Online Status: Offline Posts: 754 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
@cloverstack
My family is from Lerin, so if you want we can compare Lerin and Bitola. I guess the reason why Bitola came as a big shock to me is because I was in Lerin 2 years ago and it was just going through a building boom, there were new apartments being built everywhere (5+ floors), there are like 5 new supermarkets that just opened (some German and Spanish companies), infrastructure is not the best but the roads and bridges are in good shape. They also have a huge renovated central square, and a very very large active nightlife. All this and at the end of the day the population of Lerin is just some 12,000 people. I don't know, I guess I was just expecting more when I went to Bitola because it has a population of some 80,000 people, instead I found that Lerin has a more "city" feel to it, and it is much more cleaner and newer. Don't get me wrong I still love Bitola, it is a unique city with great historical value, but I find that it is lacking a lot when compared to other cities.
The life in the village was also great, my family comes from a village near Lerin with only 800 people, yet it has a car mechanic, grocery store, pharmacy, 2 schools, restaurant, cafes, insurence office, hair salon, and the village square has just been renovated with marble. How many villages in Macedonia with the same population can say they have half those things? The locals told me that the goverment will pay 70% of the costs of opening a new business, which is why many have done so. They also told me that the banks were easily giving loans away to anyone (I guess those days are over now).
@gitar
I agree with your view Edited by macedonia - 24-Mar-2009 at 15:16 |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
pbanks ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 01-Sep-2007 Location: Skopje Online Status: Offline Posts: 9141 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
but that's another, quite different and richer country you are talking about. It's no secret that Macedonia is among the 2-3 poorest countries in Europe. So such comparisons don't make much sense. It's something that we should strive for, but I wouldn't expect it in the next 20 years, and only if we immediately start working much more than now. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
macedonia ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 01-Feb-2008 Location: Lerinsko Online Status: Offline Posts: 754 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
delete
Edited by macedonia - 20-Aug-2012 at 03:38 |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Cloverstack ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 01-Sep-2007 Location: Скопје Online Status: Offline Posts: 12453 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
@ macedonia
We are talking about different things obviously. What I meant was to compare the country where you live and Macedonia in the field of how the central government manages to stimulate development throughout the country. Not Lerin and Bitola on how the nightlife is. Again... squares, nightlife, supermarkets, apartment buildings, office buildings, car repair shops, grocery stores, pharmacies, restaurants, cafes, plasma TVs, insurance offices, hair salons mustn't be a government business. Even if the information about the 70% is accurate I dont think it is the right way to stimulate development. The government should build infrastructure, ensure law and order, provide public education and healthcare of an adequate quality, put the macroeconomics in order, create specific conditions that stimulate development... What is wrong with Macedonia is not that Skopje gets too much public investment (which is untrue anyway, and like I said even the money that Skopje gets from the government is invested very unwisely and irresponsibly). What is wrong with Macedonia is that the infrastructure is generally in a very bad shape and is not really a priority for the government or most of the the local authorities for that matter. The government does not esure law and order, infact they often break the laws themselves. The education is subject to populist experiments that fail miserably and so on. Those and similar to those are the factors that will cripple us in the future if we don't change the way we run our country, not the myth that Skopje somehow robs the rest of the country. Edited by Cloverstack - 24-Mar-2009 at 15:40 |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
macedonia ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 01-Feb-2008 Location: Lerinsko Online Status: Offline Posts: 754 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
You seem to like the idea of building in infrastructure. That's not a bad idea, Greece invested heavily in progects that involved building roads, bridges, public transportation (for example Solun is getting a new subway system), and don't forget the 2004 olympics. I think investing in infrastructure is a great opportunity to create more jobs and bring the unemployment level down, for Macedonia infrastructure should be the top priority of the government. But in the case with Greece, there was kind of a bad effect from this, it attracted thousands of illegal migrant workers from Albania to come and work for cheap wages (there is an extimated 1 million Albanian immigrants in Greece, of which 400,000 are registered). I still kind of like the idea of the government assisting its citizens in opening new businesses, even if that "70%" does sound a little exagerated. That list of all the things I mentioned before, i was trying to describe what I saw as a result of a thriving business enviroment - the government is obviously doing something right if it attracted Spanish and German companies to open supermarkets in a small town like Lerin. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
гитардемон ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 19-Feb-2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5424 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
I often disagree on this matter. If this wasn't the case, they would call us Makedonistan or whatever... Slavomakedonia (as they did), but they realized it's all Skopje + a few corn fields. It's pretty clear that the rest of the country is unheard of in the rest of the world (even though Skopje is too) ![]()
Bitola does just about the same, and attracts more Greek citizens than Gevgelija. The thing is that Bitola attracts local farmers (poor people) from Florina and Edessa, and rarely rich gamblers or shoppers/tourists from Thessaloniki, let alone Central Greece. The thing with Gevgelija is that Thes/niki is just 50 mins away, and accessible via motorway (unlike Bitola, accessible only via "goat trails"-mountain roads, and 2 hrs away.) But still I assure you Bitola is by far a more attractive destination for Greeks (have heard it myself many times), but hey, the (unexistent) infrastructure (on both sides) plays a great part here.
Hey dude, reality check! Skopje does not give anything to the other cities! Why? Because no state money is ever invested in the rest of the cities. That's what we're discussing here. But anyway, state money is supposed to be invested in roads, bridges and railways, not churches, clocktowers and internet cafés (as I previously stated), so I don't want state money invested in churches in my city! But I don't want them invested in Skopje either. Fair enough?
I didn't say Skopje $üçk$ or it's the citizens' fault, I just said Skopje eats all the money up. It's not the mayor's fault either, it's the government's fault, and has always been (20 yrs now), which is the undeniable truth. It doesn't matter if they invest money in fashion shows or dog shows... Whatever it is, it still is done with state money! But since there's no stopping them, I really would like to see those loads of cash invested in something useful, so that I have a reason to feel bad that my city isn't getting anything (while it should, as well as the other 30+ cities). This way I'm just pissed because there are so many stupid people that are happy to have a cat sitting on a ball and a freaky little girl put on the main pedestrian street (I'm talking about the sculptures/statues), and think it's a gift from god, and it's a sin to ask for more. With that kind of attitude, we're not getting anywhere. While the last sentence was way off and had nothing to do with the subject, it's obvious that the people of Skopje don't see this as unfair and unjust. I really don't think I need to present any evidence to support my position, it's obvious, and easy to check. Just ask the forum members that aren't from Skopje, and you'll get the answer in an instant.
Man, I don't know who you hung out with in Bitola, but I assure you, and I know this from personal experience, that Florina is as dull as they get. Sth like Ohio, give or take ![]() The cleanliness part is what I definitely agree with, but hey, it's a small place, if you do something stupid you might get caught, and then everyone will know (if you're not from the Balkans this might seem pretty confusing to you, but that's how life goes here, what others say and think of you). Just go to Thessaloniki, and see how 'clean' it is. But it's no excuse, Berlin is gigantic, and still cleaner than any city in Macedonia.
That comes as a result to Greece's κοινωτικά πλαίσια στήριξης, which are something like what we had in former Yugoslavia, 5-year plans (funded with EU's money of course, but not by the EU), during which roads, bridges - infrastructure to cut to the chase, is built. Also, the EU has a programme (the ERDF - European Regional Development Fund) for the underdeveloped peripherial parts of its member countries, which I assure you throws money at EU's members begging them to improve the infrastructure, quality of life (and other sectors, I forgot how they group them) in such areas.. So, it should't come as a surprize. While all other (now) EU member countries took advantage of EU's funds while they were still only candidate countries, we, (having mastermind accountants and attorneys), couldn't fiil out the forms needed to be eligible for EU's funds in time, and now they say that by 2010 we might get fundings in 3 out of 5 sectors. Edited by гитардемон - 24-Mar-2009 at 20:10 |
||||||
Arguing on the internet is like running at the special olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded.
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
macedonia ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 01-Feb-2008 Location: Lerinsko Online Status: Offline Posts: 754 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Cloverstack ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 01-Sep-2007 Location: Скопје Online Status: Offline Posts: 12453 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
gitar, epten zabega so juznite sosedi zosto i kako ne narekuvale. stavot ti e vo najmala merka naiven i neseriozen, ama vo sekoj slucaj zabeguva od temata pa da ne go razglabame ponataka
a za ova:
Are you actually being serious??? A lot of public money gets redistributed in this country (I expect that you do understand that public spending is not only limited to statues) and there is no question that Skopje is a net contributor, not a net receiver of funds. But that is perfectly fine and understandable and I don't have a problem with it. I only wish it was done in a responsible way that stimulates the growth of the economy in the country. So, the problem is not in Skopje supposedly "eating" all the money. The problem with the lack of development (Skopje included) is that the public spending is done through a badly designed system where petty politics plays the main role and neglects the urgent priorities while wasting huge sums on all kinds of BS like inflated (party membership) administration, statues, glass domes, universities and scientific institutions in little towns and villages, countless failed public tenders, pointless advertisments by the government and so on and so on... Edited by Cloverstack - 25-Mar-2009 at 00:13 |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
гитардемон ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 19-Feb-2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5424 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
![]() My point exactly! You said the same things I said. The tax payers' dollars (actually denars, but I'm on a role here ![]()
Nah, it's actually cool. A nice small place to relax. No urban stress, no nothing (as if living in Bitola is stressful). I admit it's 10x better than any city in Macedonia, big or small, but the part about the nightlife was plain wrong, and I had to let you know ![]() Edited by гитардемон - 25-Mar-2009 at 01:32 |
||||||
Arguing on the internet is like running at the special olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded.
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Cloverstack ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 01-Sep-2007 Location: Скопје Online Status: Offline Posts: 12453 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
What point exactly dude? You mix it all up.
I stressed that statues and similar things are just a tiny amount of the total public spending in one country. You do understand this part or what? Concentrate on this:
And for the money that Skopje gets back, you admit that they are mostly shitty projects that noone needs, but then go on to say that Skopje "gets built". So you stay blind to the real problem and again miss the point completely. As far as I'm concerned you can have the damn statues or ridiculous fugly buildings in Bitola instead of Skopje for all I care, actually I'd be glad to get them out of my city if I could somehow. You say that other cities get thrown a bone by getting a new layer of asphalt now and then. Have you seen how Skopje's streets look like? They are on average probably among the worst in the country while having to support most of the economic activity. And why shouldn't I mention failed tenders? They too cost money to run! The money for roads come from special funds so what? That money doesn't fall from mars. They are taken from the taxpayer (by far the biggest amount of money comes from Skopje), or even if they are loans, they still get repayed by taxpayer money. There is a simple solution at least to the distribution and redustribution of money problem - tha central government shouldn't have 99% of the money and then redistribute it how it sees fit (irresponsibly and with political background). A proper share of the public money should be distributed to the local authorities by a formula that takes into account all the relevant factors. We can continue this discussion if you feel that we need a witch hunt, but we won't have better development, not in Skopje, not in Bitola, not anywhere by doing that. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
macedonia ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 01-Feb-2008 Location: Lerinsko Online Status: Offline Posts: 754 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
A proper share of the public money should be distributed to the local
authorities by a formula that takes into account all the relevant
factors.
wtf? It is not like that already? Central government controls 99%? You guys seriously need a new system! |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Cloverstack ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 01-Sep-2007 Location: Скопје Online Status: Offline Posts: 12453 |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
![]() I exagerrated, but the amount of money that the local authorities can raise independently is far from what they really need even for basic functioning, let alone some serious investment. |
||||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |